NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 915 MHz
- 788x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16965 vs 10305
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 vs 22.828
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.059 vs 210.585
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.961 vs 3.416
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 28.662
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 vs 162.83
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5088 vs 4938
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 vs 4938
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 10 March 2014 |
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16965 vs 10305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 vs 22.828 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 vs 210.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 vs 3.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 vs 28.662 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 vs 162.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 vs 4938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 vs 4938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 420 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 2173
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 2173
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 420 MHz |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 2173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 2173 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16965 | 10305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 22.828 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 210.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 3.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 28.662 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 162.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 4938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 4938 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3340 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3047 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Code name | TU117 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 10 March 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 901 | 904 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 80.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T400 with others
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5300
NVIDIAT400 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAT400 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4200
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 11
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
