NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 915 MHz
- 788x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16953 vs 10351
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 vs 22.828
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.059 vs 210.585
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.961 vs 3.416
- Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 28.662
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 vs 162.83
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5088 vs 4938
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 vs 4938
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 10 March 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 915 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16953 vs 10351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 vs 22.828 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 vs 210.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 vs 3.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 vs 28.662 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 vs 162.83 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 vs 4938 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 vs 4938 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3340 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 420 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 2173
- Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 2173
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 420 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 2173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 2173 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16953 | 10351 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 22.828 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 210.585 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 3.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 28.662 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 162.83 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 4938 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 4938 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3340 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3051 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 226 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1151 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | TU117 | GK104 |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 10 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 901 | 904 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 915 MHz |
Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 797 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 80.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Ansel | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |