NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 888 MHz
- 401.2x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 85.25 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
- Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17019 vs 11782
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 27 June 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz vs 888 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s vs 85.25 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17019 vs 11782 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
- Around 96% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 420 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 1152 vs 384
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 2173
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 2173
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 420 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 384 |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 2173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 2173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17019 | 11782 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1333 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Code name | TU117 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 27 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 851 | 854 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 888 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1152 |
| Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 85.25 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,540 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,046 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 5600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T400 with others
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 GT
NVIDIAT400 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5850
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 OEM
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 860M
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAP106-090
NVIDIAT400 vs
AppleM2 8-core
