NVIDIA T500 Mobile vs AMD FirePro S7150
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T500 Mobile and AMD FirePro S7150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T500 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 807.1x more texture fill rate: 94.92 GTexel/s vs 117.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 583
- 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 583
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28280 vs 27025
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 vs 1 February 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s vs 117.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 583 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28280 vs 27025 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7150
- 2x more pipelines: 1792 vs 896
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6147 vs 5095
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6147 vs 5095
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4359 vs 3199
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4359 vs 3199
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 896 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6147 vs 5095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6147 vs 5095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4359 vs 3199 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4359 vs 3199 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T500 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S7150
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T500 Mobile | AMD FirePro S7150 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5095 | 6147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5095 | 6147 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 | 4359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 | 4359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 583 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28280 | 27025 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3530 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.544 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 570.969 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.687 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.637 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T500 Mobile | AMD FirePro S7150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Tonga |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 | 1 February 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 654 | 655 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,399 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 94.92 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.075 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.037 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 54.24 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s | 117.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 5,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T500 Mobile with others
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 280 PCI
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon X600 XT
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro W6150M
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro S7150
