NVIDIA T500 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T500 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T500 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1002 MHz
- Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1053 MHz
- 1609.6x more texture fill rate: 94.92 GTexel/s vs 58.97 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5095 vs 3301
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5095 vs 3301
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3199 vs 2086
- Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3199 vs 2086
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 vs 1 March 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1002 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1053 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s vs 58.97 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5095 vs 3301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5095 vs 3301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 vs 2086 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 vs 2086 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6466 vs 3339
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6466 vs 3339
- Around 76% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51217 vs 29076
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6466 vs 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6466 vs 3339 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 51217 vs 29076 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T500 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T500 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5095 | 3301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5095 | 3301 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 | 2086 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 | 2086 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 6466 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 6466 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29076 | 51217 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2498 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.158 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 876.241 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.983 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 64.599 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 194.258 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T500 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Baffin |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 | 1 March 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 648 | 649 |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1053 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1002 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 94.92 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.075 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.037 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 896 | 896 |
| Pixel fill rate | 54.24 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s | 58.97 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,887 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 112.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T500 Mobile with others
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2300
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3430
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 580
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 360 OEM
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4150 Mobile
