NVIDIA T500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T500 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T500 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1266 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1354 MHz
- 2038.7x more texture fill rate: 94.92 GTexel/s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 40 Watt
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5095 vs 3575
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5095 vs 3575
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28574 vs 12475
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 vs 1 February 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1266 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1354 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s vs 46.56 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 512 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 40 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5095 vs 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5095 vs 3575 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28574 vs 12475 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620
- 4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3199
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3199
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3339
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3339
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 vs 3199 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 vs 3199 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 vs 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 vs 3339 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T500 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P620
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T500 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5095 | 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5095 | 3575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 | 3881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 | 3881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 6631 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 6631 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28574 | 12475 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T500 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU117 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 | 1 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 625 | 583 |
| Price now | $176.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 25.53 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1354 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 1266 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 94.92 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.075 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.037 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 896 | 512 |
| Pixel fill rate | 54.24 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s | 46.56 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,490 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 64.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T500 Mobile with others
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GT
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1800 XL
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7350 LE
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8690M
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro W5100
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla M10
