NVIDIA T500 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 8690M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T500 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 8690M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T500 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 2.2x more boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 775 MHz
- 5752.7x more texture fill rate: 94.92 GTexel/s vs 16.5 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 896 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5095 vs 1579
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5095 vs 1579
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3199 vs 1813
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3199 vs 1813
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 3178
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 3178
- 5.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28574 vs 5079
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 vs 1 March 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s vs 16.5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 384 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5095 vs 1579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5095 vs 1579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 vs 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 vs 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 3178 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 3178 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28574 vs 5079 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8690M
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T500 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8690M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T500 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 8690M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5095 | 1579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5095 | 1579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 | 1813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3178 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3178 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28574 | 5079 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 984 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T500 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 8690M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Sun |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 | 1 March 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 625 | 628 |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 94.92 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.075 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.037 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 896 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 54.24 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s | 16.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 1,040 million |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Floating-point performance | 528.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 32 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T500 Mobile with others
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GT
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1800 XL
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7350 LE
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8690M
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro W5100
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla M10
