NVIDIA TITAN RTX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN RTX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1710 MHz
- Around 57% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 2944
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20113 vs 18762
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 104551
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 25500
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 25500
- Around 39% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 15164 vs 10913
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 December 2018 vs 20 September 2018 |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1710 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 2944 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20113 vs 18762 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 vs 104551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 25500 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 vs 10913 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 280 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 906 vs 829
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3707
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 3353
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3707
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 3353
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 280 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 906 vs 829 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20113 | 18762 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 829 | 906 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 | 104551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 | 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 6293 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 | 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 6293 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 15164 | 10913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA TITAN RTX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU102 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 18 December 2018 | 20 September 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | $699 |
| Place in performance rating | 96 | 99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Price now | $749.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1710 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 4608 | 2944 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 280 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Transistor count | 18,600 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA TITAN RTX with others
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIAQuadro GP100
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIARTX A6000
NVIDIATITAN RTX vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
