NVIDIA TITAN Xp vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA TITAN Xp and AMD Radeon R9 295X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1018 MHz
- Around 6% better floating-point performance: 12,150 gflops vs 2x 5,733 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 500 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 9.1x more memory clock speed: 11408 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17881 vs 8681
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 934 vs 752
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 April 2017 vs 29 April 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1018 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops vs 2x 5,733 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 500 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17881 vs 8681 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 vs 752 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- 5.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 379.7 GTexel / s
- Around 47% higher pipelines: 2x 2816 vs 3840
Texture fill rate | 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 379.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2816 vs 3840 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA TITAN Xp
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 295X2
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17881 | 8681 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 934 | 752 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72551 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 256.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2513.321 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.708 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.083 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1139.382 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10966 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10966 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2372 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GP102 | Vesuvius |
Launch date | 6 April 2017 | 29 April 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | $1,499 |
Place in performance rating | 225 | 203 |
Price now | $1,200 | $1,099.99 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.97 | 11.14 |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | 1018 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1405 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | 2x 5,733 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3840 | 2x 2816 |
Texture fill rate | 379.7 GTexel / s | 2x 179.2 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 500 Watt |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | 6,200 million |
Stream Processors | 5632 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 307 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2 x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 2.1 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 547.6 GB / s | 640 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 2x 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 11408 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |