NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs AMD Radeon HD 6450A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm and AMD Radeon HD 6450A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 32.8x more texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
- 16.8x more pipelines: 2688 vs 160
- 19.7x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 200 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- 4.9x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1066 MHz
- 11.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2918 vs 260
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 November 2012 vs 7 April 2011 |
Core clock speed | 732 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 164.0 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2688 vs 160 |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops vs 200 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1066 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2918 vs 260 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6450A
- 9.4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 235 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 208 vs 172
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 235 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 208 vs 172 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6450A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | AMD Radeon HD 6450A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2918 | 260 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 208 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17075 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.455 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | AMD Radeon HD 6450A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GK110 | Caicos |
Launch date | 12 November 2012 | 7 April 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Place in performance rating | 805 | 807 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 732 MHz | 625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops | 200 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2688 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 164.0 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 235 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 249.6 GB / s | 8.53 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 1066 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |