AMD FirePro M4100 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M4100 and NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 623 vs 172
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3591 vs 1032
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3591 vs 1032
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 vs 12 November 2012 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 623 vs 172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3591 vs 1032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3591 vs 1032 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 670 MHz
- 10.2x more texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 16.08 GTexel / s
- 7x more pipelines: 2688 vs 384
- 7.6x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 514.6 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2918 vs 1059
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17075 vs 5067
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.455 vs 15.905
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1666.354 vs 432.116
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.836 vs 1.48
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 92.472 vs 24.029
- 3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 275.229 vs 74.162
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 3361
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 3361
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 732 MHz vs 670 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 164.0 GTexel / s vs 16.08 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2688 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops vs 514.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2918 vs 1059 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17075 vs 5067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.455 vs 15.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 vs 432.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 vs 1.48 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 vs 24.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 vs 74.162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 vs 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 vs 3361 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M4100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M4100 | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1059 | 2918 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 623 | 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5067 | 17075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 15.905 | 49.455 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 432.116 | 1666.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.48 | 5.836 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.029 | 92.472 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 74.162 | 275.229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3591 | 1032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 7038 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3591 | 1032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 7038 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M4100 | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Mars | GK110 |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 | 12 November 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 803 | 804 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 670 MHz | 732 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 514.6 gflops | 3,935 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 2688 |
Texture fill rate | 16.08 GTexel / s | 164.0 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 7,080 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 235 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB / s | 249.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration |