NVIDIA Quadro P500 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P500 and NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 99% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 732 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 7.8x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 235 Watt
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 240 vs 172
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 1032
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 1032
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2018 vs 12 November 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 732 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 235 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 vs 172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 1032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 1032 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- 7.7x more texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
- 10.5x more pipelines: 2688 vs 256
- 5.8x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2918 vs 1631
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16581 vs 6352
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 3353
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 164.0 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2688 vs 256 |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops vs 679.9 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2918 vs 1631 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16581 vs 6352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P500 | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1631 | 2918 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 240 | 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6352 | 16581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2622 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2622 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 1032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 1032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 7038 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 7038 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.455 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P500 | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP108 | GK110 |
Launch date | 5 January 2018 | 12 November 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 801 | 804 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1519 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 732 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | 3,935 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 2688 |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | 164.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 235 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12_1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | 249.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor |