NVIDIA Quadro P500 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P500 and NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro P500

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P500

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 99% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 732 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
7.8x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 235 Watt
Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 240 vs 172
3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 1032
3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 1032

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 January 2018 vs 12 November 2012
Core clock speed	1455 MHz vs 732 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 235 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	240 vs 172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685 vs 1032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685 vs 1032

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

7.7x more texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
10.5x more pipelines: 2688 vs 256
5.8x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2918 vs 1631
2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17075 vs 6226
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 3353
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 3353

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	164.0 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2688 vs 256
Floating-point performance	3,935 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2918 vs 1631
Geekbench - OpenCL	17075 vs 6226
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	7038 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	7038 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1631

2918

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

240

172

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

6226

17075

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

1032

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3685

1032

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

7038

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

7038

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P500	NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
PassMark - G3D Mark	1631	2918
PassMark - G2D Mark	240	172
Geekbench - OpenCL	6226	17075
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2622
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2622
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685	1032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685	1032
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	7038
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	7038
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		49.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1666.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		92.472
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		275.229

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P500	NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Code name	GP108	GK110
Launch date	5 January 2018	12 November 2012
Place in performance rating	801	804
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$7,699
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1519 MHz
Core clock speed	1455 MHz	732 MHz
Floating-point performance	679.9 gflops	3,935 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	256	2688
Texture fill rate	21.25 GTexel / s	164.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	235 Watt
Transistor count	1,800 million	7,080 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	3x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12_1	12.0 (11_0)
Vulkan
OpenGL		4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	32.1 GB / s	249.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	5200 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
CUDA
Multi Monitor