NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm and NVIDIA Quadro K5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
  • Around 22% higher core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 601 MHz
  • 2.4x more texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 67.31 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 2688 vs 1344
  • 2.4x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 1,615 gflops
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 73% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 3000 MHz
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2918 vs 2779
  • 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17075 vs 5107
  • 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.455 vs 24.713
  • 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1666.354 vs 685.1
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.836 vs 2.189
  • 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 92.472 vs 28.929
  • 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 275.229 vs 68.712
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 3353
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 3353
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 November 2012 vs 7 August 2012
Core clock speed 732 MHz vs 601 MHz
Texture fill rate 164.0 GTexel / s vs 67.31 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2688 vs 1344
Floating-point performance 3,935 gflops vs 1,615 gflops
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed 5200 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2918 vs 2779
Geekbench - OpenCL 17075 vs 5107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 49.455 vs 24.713
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1666.354 vs 685.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.836 vs 2.189
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 92.472 vs 28.929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 275.229 vs 68.712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7038 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7038 vs 3353

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

  • 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 235 Watt
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 172
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 1032
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 1032
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt vs 235 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 355 vs 172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3712 vs 1032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3712 vs 1032

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2918
2779
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
172
355
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
17075
5107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
49.455
24.713
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1666.354
685.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.836
2.189
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
92.472
28.929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
275.229
68.712
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1032
3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7038
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1032
3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7038
3353
Name NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
PassMark - G3D Mark 2918 2779
PassMark - G2D Mark 172 355
Geekbench - OpenCL 17075 5107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 49.455 24.713
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1666.354 685.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.836 2.189
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 92.472 28.929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 275.229 68.712
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1032 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7038 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1032 3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7038 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4825

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Kepler
Code name GK110 GK104
Launch date 12 November 2012 7 August 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $7,699 $329.99
Place in performance rating 804 805
Type Workstation Mobile workstation
Price now $391
Value for money (0-100) 8.47

Technical info

Core clock speed 732 MHz 601 MHz
Floating-point performance 3,935 gflops 1,615 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2688 1344
Texture fill rate 164.0 GTexel / s 67.31 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 235 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 7,080 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 267 mm
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 249.6 GB / s 96 GB / s
Memory bus width 384 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5200 MHz 3000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0