NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm and NVIDIA Quadro K5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
Around 22% higher core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 601 MHz
2.4x more texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 67.31 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 2688 vs 1344
2.4x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 1,615 gflops
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
Around 73% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2918 vs 2779
3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17075 vs 5107
2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.455 vs 24.713
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1666.354 vs 685.1
2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.836 vs 2.189
3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 92.472 vs 28.929
4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 275.229 vs 68.712
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 3353
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 3353

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 November 2012 vs 7 August 2012
Core clock speed	732 MHz vs 601 MHz
Texture fill rate	164.0 GTexel / s vs 67.31 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2688 vs 1344
Floating-point performance	3,935 gflops vs 1,615 gflops
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2918 vs 2779
Geekbench - OpenCL	17075 vs 5107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	49.455 vs 24.713
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1666.354 vs 685.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.836 vs 2.189
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	92.472 vs 28.929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	275.229 vs 68.712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	7038 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	7038 vs 3353

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

2.4x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 235 Watt
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 172
3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 1032
3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 1032

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt vs 235 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	355 vs 172
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3712 vs 1032
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3712 vs 1032

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2918

2779

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

172

355

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

17075

5107

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

49.455

24.713

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1666.354

685.1

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.836

2.189

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

92.472

28.929

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

275.229

68.712

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1032

3712

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7038

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1032

3712

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7038

3353

Name	NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm	NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2918	2779
PassMark - G2D Mark	172	355
Geekbench - OpenCL	17075	5107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	49.455	24.713
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1666.354	685.1
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.836	2.189
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	92.472	28.929
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	275.229	68.712
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1032	3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	7038	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1032	3712
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	7038	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		4825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		4825

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm	NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK110	GK104
Launch date	12 November 2012	7 August 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$7,699	$329.99
Place in performance rating	805	806
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Price now		$391
Value for money (0-100)		8.47
Technical info
Core clock speed	732 MHz	601 MHz
Floating-point performance	3,935 gflops	1,615 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2688	1344
Texture fill rate	164.0 GTexel / s	67.31 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	235 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	7,080 million	3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	267 mm
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	249.6 GB / s	96 GB / s
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0