NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs ATI Radeon HD 4250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm and ATI Radeon HD 4250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 594 MHz
- 69x more texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 2.376 GTexel / s
- 67.2x more pipelines: 2688 vs 40
- 82.8x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 47.52 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
- 6.6x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 792 MHz
- 23.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2918 vs 123
- 9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 782
- 9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 782
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 November 2012 vs 25 February 2009 |
Core clock speed | 732 MHz vs 594 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 164.0 GTexel / s vs 2.376 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2688 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops vs 47.52 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 792 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2918 vs 123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 vs 782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 vs 782 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4250
- 9.4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 235 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 408 vs 172
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 235 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 408 vs 172 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4250
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | ATI Radeon HD 4250 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2918 | 123 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 408 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16023 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.455 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 | 782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 | 782 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | ATI Radeon HD 4250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK110 | RV620 |
Launch date | 12 November 2012 | 25 February 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Place in performance rating | 791 | 793 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 732 MHz | 594 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops | 47.52 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2688 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 164.0 GTexel / s | 2.376 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 235 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 249.6 GB / s | 6.34 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 792 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | yes | |
Technologies |
||
HDCP support | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |