AMD Radeon Pro 450 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 450 and NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 450

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 9% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 732 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 235 Watt
• 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 619 vs 172
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1749 vs 1032
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1749 vs 1032

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

• 5.1x more texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
• 4.2x more pipelines: 2688 vs 640
• 3.8x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 2% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 5080 MHz
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2918 vs 2723
• Around 80% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16023 vs 8908
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.455 vs 26.707
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1666.354 vs 568.609
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.836 vs 2.409
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 92.472 vs 39.784
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 275.229 vs 126.562
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 3344
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 3344

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 450
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2723 2918
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	619 172
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	8908 16023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.707 49.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	568.609 1666.354
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.409 5.836
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.784 92.472
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	126.562 275.229
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1749 1032
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 7038
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1749 1032
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 7038

Compare specifications (specs)