NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs ATI Radeon X600 SE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm and ATI Radeon X600 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 325 MHz
- 126.2x more texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 110 nm
- 48x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 128 MB
- 10.4x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 89.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4403 vs 49
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 November 2012 vs 1 September 2004 |
Core clock speed | 732 MHz vs 325 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 164.0 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4403 vs 49 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X600 SE
- 6.5x lower typical power consumption: 36 Watt vs 235 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 229 vs 198
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 36 Watt vs 235 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 229 vs 198 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X600 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | ATI Radeon X600 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4403 | 49 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 | 229 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16664 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.455 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | ATI Radeon X600 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Rage 9 |
Code name | GK110 | RV370 |
Launch date | 12 November 2012 | 1 September 2004 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Place in performance rating | 757 | 760 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 732 MHz | 325 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 2688 | |
Texture fill rate | 164.0 GTexel / s | 1.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 235 Watt | 36 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 107 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 249.6 GB / s | 4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |