NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 732 MHz
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 235 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 511 vs 198
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 1032
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 1032
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 vs 12 November 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 732 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt vs 235 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 511 vs 198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 1032 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- 4.7x more texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 2688 vs 512
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 1,111 gflops
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- 1040x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4403 vs 3338
- Around 80% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16664 vs 9266
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.455 vs 34.239
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1666.354 vs 639.427
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.836 vs 2.341
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 92.472 vs 32
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 275.229 vs 69.814
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 3346
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 3346
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 164.0 GTexel / s vs 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2688 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops vs 1,111 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 5.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4403 vs 3338 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16664 vs 9266 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.455 vs 34.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 vs 639.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 vs 2.341 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 vs 32 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 vs 69.814 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 vs 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 vs 3346 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3338 | 4403 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 511 | 198 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9266 | 16664 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 | 49.455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 | 1666.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 | 5.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 | 92.472 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 | 275.229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 | 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 | 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 7038 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1051 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM107 | GK110 |
| Launch date | 18 February 2014 | 12 November 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $119 | $7,699 |
| Place in performance rating | 755 | 757 |
| Price now | $150.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.54 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1085 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 732 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 512 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,111 gflops | 3,935 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 2688 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.72 GTexel / s | 164.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 235 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 249.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5.0 GB/s | 5200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4290 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIATesla C2070
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIATesla K20Xm
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
NVIDIATesla K80m
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 750 vs
AMDRadeon 630
