NVIDIA Tesla K80m vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80m and NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 13.3x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 164.0 GTexel / s
- Around 86% higher pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 2688
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 3,935 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18416 vs 16664
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 62.651 vs 49.455
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.882 vs 5.836
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2014 vs 12 November 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 164.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2496 vs 2688 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,373 gflops vs 3,935 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 12 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18416 vs 16664 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.651 vs 49.455 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.882 vs 5.836 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 235 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1666.354 vs 1653.567
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 92.472 vs 86.984
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 275.229 vs 258.278
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 732 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 235 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 vs 1653.567 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 vs 86.984 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 vs 258.278 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80m | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18416 | 16664 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 62.651 | 49.455 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1653.567 | 1666.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.984 | 92.472 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 258.278 | 275.229 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.882 | 5.836 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4403 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1032 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80m | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GK210 | GK110 |
Launch date | 17 November 2014 | 12 November 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 733 | 746 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 732 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,373 gflops | 3,935 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2496 | 2688 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec | 164.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 235 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 12 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 240.6 GB / s | 249.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |