NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm and NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• 4.4x more texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 37.2 GTexel / s
• 9.3x more pipelines: 2688 vs 288
• 4.4x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 894.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 3828 MHz
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2918 vs 2006
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 1914
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 1914

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 776 MHz vs 732 MHz
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 102 Watt vs 235 Watt
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 443 vs 172

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2918 2006
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	172 443
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7038 1914
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7038 1914

Compare specifications (specs)