NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q vs ATI Radeon HD 5850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q and ATI Radeon HD 5850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.784 vs 16.467
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.125 vs 1.541
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.227 vs 42.08
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 404
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 July 2011 vs 30 September 2009 |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.784 vs 16.467 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.125 vs 1.541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 vs 42.08 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 404 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5850
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 574 MHz
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 52.2 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 1440 vs 448
- 2x better floating-point performance: 2,088.0 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
- Around 49% lower typical power consumption: 151 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 3132 MHz
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1109.612 vs 917.512
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1970 vs 1306
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 574 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 52.2 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1440 vs 448 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,088.0 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 151 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 3132 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1109.612 vs 917.512 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1970 vs 1306 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5850
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q | ATI Radeon HD 5850 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.784 | 16.467 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.512 | 1109.612 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.125 | 1.541 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 44.227 | 42.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.533 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 404 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1306 | 1970 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33977 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3806 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3806 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q | ATI Radeon HD 5850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GF100 | Cypress |
| Launch date | 25 July 2011 | 30 September 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,489 | $299 |
| Place in performance rating | 769 | 770 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | 2,088.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 448 | 1440 |
| Texture fill rate | 32.1 GTexel / s | 52.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 151 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | 2,154 million |
| Boost clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | 241 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB / s | 128.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3132 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q with others
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q vs
ATIRadeon HD 4550
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4650
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q vs
ATIRadeon HD 5850
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
