NVIDIA Tesla M40 vs NVIDIA Tesla M60
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M40 and NVIDIA Tesla M60 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M40
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 948 MHz vs 557 MHz
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39184 vs 29272
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10220 vs 7652
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 183.81 vs 114.389
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2637.997 vs 1451.124
- Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.059 vs 8.266
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.359 vs 70.038
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 688.388 vs 314.404
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 November 2015 vs 30 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 948 MHz vs 557 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39184 vs 29272 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10220 vs 7652 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 183.81 vs 114.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2637.997 vs 1451.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.059 vs 8.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.359 vs 70.038 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 688.388 vs 314.404 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M60
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1178 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- 10.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 213.9 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 3072
- Around 41% better floating-point performance: 2x 4,833 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 12 GB
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 517 vs 437
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1178 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 213.9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 3072 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,833 gflops vs 6,844 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 517 vs 437 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M40
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M60
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M40 | NVIDIA Tesla M60 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39184 | 29272 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 437 | 517 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10220 | 7652 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 183.81 | 114.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2637.997 | 1451.124 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.059 | 8.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.359 | 70.038 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 688.388 | 314.404 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8663 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 886 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1791 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8663 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 886 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1791 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M40 | NVIDIA Tesla M60 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GM200 | GM204 |
Launch date | 10 November 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 260 | 475 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1114 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Core clock speed | 948 MHz | 557 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2x 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 213.9 GTexel / s | 2x 151.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 8,000 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 2x 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB / s | 2x 160.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |