NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA Tesla M40
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and NVIDIA Tesla M40 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 948 MHz
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8004 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11659 vs 10220
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 776 vs 437
- Around 48% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 58014 vs 39184
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 189.842 vs 183.81
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.408 vs 13.059
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 875.838 vs 688.388
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 March 2019 vs 10 November 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 948 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8004 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11659 vs 10220 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 vs 437 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 58014 vs 39184 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 vs 183.81 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 vs 13.059 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 vs 688.388 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M40
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2637.997 vs 1902.867
- Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.359 vs 116.183
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2637.997 vs 1902.867 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.359 vs 116.183 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M40
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11659 | 10220 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 | 437 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 58014 | 39184 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 | 183.81 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 | 2637.997 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 | 13.059 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 | 160.359 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 | 688.388 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1065 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA Tesla M40 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | TU116 | GM200 |
| Launch date | 14 March 2019 | 10 November 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $219 | |
| Place in performance rating | 258 | 260 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 948 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6,600 million | 8,000 million |
| Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | |
| Texture fill rate | 213.9 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 8004 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
