NVIDIA Tesla P4 vs AMD Radeon E8870
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla P4 and AMD Radeon E8870 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 170.1 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 768
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 5,443 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9097 vs 3368
- 4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.62 vs 36.948
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1791.761 vs 874.689
- 8.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.457 vs 1.11
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 vs 4620
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 vs 4620
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 September 2016 vs 29 September 2015 |
Texture fill rate | 170.1 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 5,443 gflops vs 1,536 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9097 vs 3368 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 vs 36.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 vs 874.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 vs 1.11 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 vs 4620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 vs 4620 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8870
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 708 vs 391
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5030 vs 3698
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 18191 vs 3341
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5030 vs 3698
- 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 18191 vs 3341
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 708 vs 391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5030 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 18191 vs 3341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5030 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 18191 vs 3341 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8870
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | AMD Radeon E8870 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9097 | 3368 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 391 | 708 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37912 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | 36.948 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | 874.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | 1.11 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | 4620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 5030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 | 18191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 | 4620 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 5030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 | 18191 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla P4 | AMD Radeon E8870 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Saturn |
Launch date | 13 September 2016 | 29 September 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 354 | 351 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1063 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,443 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 170.1 GTexel / s | 48 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 2,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |