NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla P4

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA Tesla P4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

• Around 6% higher core clock speed: 855 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1063 MHz
• 536.2x more texture fill rate: 91.20 GTexel/s vs 170.1 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 392
• Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40073 vs 37864
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 157.821 vs 147.62
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1934.012 vs 1791.761
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.833 vs 9.457
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.552 vs 99.574
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 684.333 vs 523.29

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4

• 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• 4.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9065 vs 7775
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11409 vs 9851
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 2476
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 2238
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11409 vs 9851
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 2476
• Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P4

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7775 9065
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	476 392
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	40073 37864
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.821 147.62
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1934.012 1791.761
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.833 9.457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	136.552 99.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	684.333 523.29
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 11409
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3341

Compare specifications (specs)