NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB vs AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB and AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1312 MHz vs 950 MHz
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 2x 2048
- Around 71% better floating-point performance: 14,029 gflops vs 2x 4,096 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 375 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2x 3 GB
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16235 vs 5214
- 11.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.053 vs 44.481
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7209.392 vs 1984.655
- 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.826 vs 8.536
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1253.829 vs 470.237
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 June 2017 vs 24 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1312 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 2x 2048 |
Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops vs 2x 4,096 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2x 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16235 vs 5214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 vs 44.481 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 vs 1984.655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.826 vs 8.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1253.829 vs 470.237 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
- 4.9x more texture fill rate: 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 438.4 GTexel / s
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1752 MHz
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 658 vs 406
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.504 vs 73.167
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 438.4 GTexel / s |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1752 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 658 vs 406 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.504 vs 73.167 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16235 | 5214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 | 658 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 180318 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 | 44.481 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 | 1984.655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.826 | 8.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 73.167 | 125.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1253.829 | 470.237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Volta | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GV100 | Malta |
Launch date | 21 June 2017 | 24 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 135 | 320 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1312 MHz | 950 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | 2x 4,096 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 5120 | 2x 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 438.4 GTexel / s | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 375 Watt |
Transistor count | 21,100 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Length | 307 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2x 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | 2x 288.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 2x 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |