NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 438.4 GTexel / s vs 283.4 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2560
- Around 55% better floating-point performance: 14,029 gflops vs 9,068 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- 175.2x more memory clock speed: 1752 MHz vs 10 GB/s
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131696 vs 55407
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2018 vs 15 August 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 438.4 GTexel / s vs 283.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 2560 |
Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops vs 9,068 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz vs 10 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 131696 vs 55407 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1771 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 vs 19081
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 vs 19081
- 74.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 vs 62
- 74.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 vs 62
- 73.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 vs 57
- 73.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 vs 57
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1771 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 vs 19081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 vs 19081 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 vs 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 vs 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 vs 57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 vs 57 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 131696 | 55407 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19081 | 20151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19081 | 20151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 62 | 4646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 62 | 4646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 57 | 4195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 57 | 4195 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7222 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Volta | Pascal |
Code name | GV100 | GP104 |
Launch date | 27 March 2018 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 272 | 275 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499.99 | |
Price now | $439.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1771 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | 9,068 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 5120 | 2560 |
Texture fill rate | 438.4 GTexel / s | 283.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 21,100 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 2560 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz | 10 GB/s |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |