NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB and AMD Radeon R9 Fury videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 96% higher texture fill rate: 438.4 GTexel / s vs 224.0 GTexel / s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 5120 vs 3584
- Around 96% better floating-point performance: 14,029 gflops vs 7,168 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 275 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 1752 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131696 vs 53058
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19081 vs 10116
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19081 vs 10116
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2018 vs 10 July 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 438.4 GTexel / s vs 224.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 3584 |
Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops vs 7,168 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 131696 vs 53058 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19081 vs 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19081 vs 10116 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury
- 60x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 62
- 60x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 62
- 58.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 57
- 58.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 57
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 62 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 57 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB | AMD Radeon R9 Fury |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 131696 | 53058 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19081 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19081 | 10116 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 62 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 62 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 57 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 57 | 3356 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9555 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 141.671 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3600.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.2 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.144 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 791.572 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4739 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB | AMD Radeon R9 Fury | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Volta | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GV100 | Fiji |
Launch date | 27 March 2018 | 10 July 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 264 | 265 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Price now | $399.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 35.98 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | 7,168 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 5120 | 3584 |
Texture fill rate | 438.4 GTexel / s | 224.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 21,100 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 56 | |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | 512 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 4096 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |