NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- 216.8x more texture fill rate: 95.04 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 144x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 62
- 141.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 57
- 144x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 62
- 141.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 57
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 27 March 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s vs 438.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 vs 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 vs 57 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 vs 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 vs 57 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- 5x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1024
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 131696 vs 42000
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19081 vs 12180
- Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19081 vs 12180
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 131696 vs 42000 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19081 vs 12180 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19081 vs 12180 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7542 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 42000 | 131696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.235 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1843.045 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.681 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 115.607 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 644.098 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12180 | 19081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8926 | 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8062 | 57 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12180 | 19081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8926 | 62 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8062 | 57 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3656 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Code name | TU117 | GV100 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 27 March 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 270 | 273 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1485 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 95.04 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.083 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.041 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 47.52 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 95.04 GTexel/s | 438.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,029 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1752 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
