NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1470 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- 2058.7x more texture fill rate: 224.4 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
- Around 31% higher pipelines: 2176 vs 1664
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- 250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 850 vs 766
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15977 vs 9640
- 21.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8026 vs 369
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 Dec 2021 vs 19 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 224.4 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2176 vs 1664 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 850 vs 766 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 vs 9640 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8026 vs 369 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
- Around 24% lower typical power consumption: 148 Watt vs 184 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 148 Watt vs 184 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 850 | 766 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 | 9640 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8026 | 369 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 28498 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 105.107 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1225.96 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.737 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.714 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 490.688 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11499 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11499 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | TU106 | GM204 |
Launch date | 7 Dec 2021 | 19 September 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 54 | 371 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Price now | $407.76 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 28.59 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 224.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.36 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.181 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2176 | 1664 |
Pixel fill rate | 79.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 224.4 GTexel/s | 109 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 184 Watt | 148 Watt |
Transistor count | 10800 million | 5,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1664 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,920 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 98 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | 500 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pins |
Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | 4x | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 224 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |