NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A6000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1860 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 193937 vs 147346
- Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 735.8 vs 401.574
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 58.523 vs 43.914
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2342.233 vs 2101.927
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23142 vs 21578
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3290
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23142 vs 21578
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 3652
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3290
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 Oct 2020 vs 13 August 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1860 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 vs 147346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 vs 401.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 vs 43.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 vs 2101.927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 vs 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 vs 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3290 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19278 vs 4237
- 10x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 858 vs 86
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 178.784
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19278 vs 4237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 858 vs 86 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 vs 178.784 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 19278 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 858 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 193937 | 147346 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 735.8 | 401.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 58.523 | 43.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 178.784 | 215.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2342.233 | 2101.927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3290 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA102 | TU102 |
| Launch date | 5 Oct 2020 | 13 August 2018 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $4649 | $9,999 |
| Place in performance rating | 98 | 104 |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1860 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 10752 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 625.0 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 28300 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 8-pin EPS | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 48 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 768 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A6000 with others
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700M
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIARTX A2000
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600
