NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A6000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1005 MHz
• Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1860 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 200330 vs 151166
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 737.53 vs 401.574
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 59.432 vs 43.914
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2347.314 vs 2101.927
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23142 vs 21578
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 vs 3652
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3290
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23142 vs 21578
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 vs 3652
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3290

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

• Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
• 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19278 vs 4237
• 10x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 858 vs 86
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 189.702

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4237 19278
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	86 858
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	200330 151166
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	737.53 401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	59.432 43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	189.702 215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2347.314 2101.927
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23142 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3712 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	23142 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3712 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3290

Compare specifications (specs)