AMD A10-6800K versus AMD A8-6600K
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A10-6800K et AMD A8-6600K pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-6800K
- Environ 5% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4.4 GHz versus 4.2 GHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1596 versus 1527
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3199 versus 2995
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 542 versus 534
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1494 versus 1460
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.893 versus 4.575
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 10.547 versus 9.757
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.209 versus 0.196
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.801 versus 3.691
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1267 versus 525
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4136 versus 1008
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4604 versus 2178
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1267 versus 525
- 4.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4136 versus 1008
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4604 versus 2178
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 4.4 GHz versus 4.2 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1596 versus 1527 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3199 versus 2995 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 542 versus 534 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1494 versus 1460 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.893 versus 4.575 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.547 versus 9.757 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.209 versus 0.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.801 versus 3.691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1267 versus 525 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4136 versus 1008 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4604 versus 2178 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1267 versus 525 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4136 versus 1008 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4604 versus 2178 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A8-6600K
- Environ 54% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 100 Watt
- 22.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.427 versus 0.604
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 100 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.427 versus 0.604 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A10-6800K
CPU 2: AMD A8-6600K
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD A10-6800K | AMD A8-6600K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1596 | 1527 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3199 | 2995 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 542 | 534 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1494 | 1460 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.893 | 4.575 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.547 | 9.757 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.209 | 0.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.604 | 13.427 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.801 | 3.691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1267 | 525 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4136 | 1008 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4604 | 2178 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1267 | 525 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4136 | 1008 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4604 | 2178 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD A10-6800K | AMD A8-6600K | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Richland | Richland |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Date de sortie | 4 June 2013 | 4 June 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $142 | $142 |
| OPN PIB | AD680KWOHLBOX | AD660KWOHLBOX |
| OPN Tray | AD680KWOA44HL | AD660KWOA44HL |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1514 | 2287 |
| Série | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | AMD A8-Series APU for Desktops |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Fréquence de base | 4.1 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Taille de dé | 246 mm | 246 mm |
| Cache L1 | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| Cache L2 | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 32 nm SOI | 32 nm SOI |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 74 °C | 74 °C |
| Température de noyau maximale | 74°C | 74°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 4.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
| Compte de transistor | 1303 Million | 1303 Million |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Fréquence mémoire prise en charge | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 844 MHz | 844 MHz |
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 384 | 256 |
| Nombre de pipelines | 384 | 256 |
| Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon HD 8670D | AMD Radeon HD 8570D |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
Compatibilité |
||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Prise courants soutenu | FM2 | FM2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 65 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
