AMD A10-7800 versus AMD A8-6500
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A10-7800 et AMD A8-6500 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Périphériques. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A10-7800
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 28 nm versus 32 nm SOI
- Environ 33% plus de la cache L1, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L1 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3215 versus 2828
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1390 versus 1304
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.473 versus 3.921
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 10.821 versus 8.804
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.18 versus 0.167
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.668 versus 0.55
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.524 versus 2.751
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1750 versus 867
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1750 versus 867
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 32 nm SOI |
| Cache L1 | 256 KB versus 192 KB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3215 versus 2828 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1390 versus 1304 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.473 versus 3.921 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.821 versus 8.804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.18 versus 0.167 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.668 versus 0.55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.524 versus 2.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1750 versus 867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1750 versus 867 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A8-6500
- Environ 5% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4.1 GHz versus 3.9 GHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1475 versus 1458
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 490 versus 476
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2306 versus 1508
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 versus 3316
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2306 versus 1508
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 versus 3316
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 4.1 GHz versus 3.9 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1475 versus 1458 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 490 versus 476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2306 versus 1508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 versus 3316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2306 versus 1508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 versus 3316 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A10-7800
CPU 2: AMD A8-6500
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD A10-7800 | AMD A8-6500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1458 | 1475 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3215 | 2828 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 476 | 490 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1390 | 1304 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.473 | 3.921 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.821 | 8.804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.18 | 0.167 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.668 | 0.55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.524 | 2.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1750 | 867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1508 | 2306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3316 | 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1750 | 867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1508 | 2306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3316 | 3341 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD A10-7800 | AMD A8-6500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
| OPN PIB | AD7800YBJABOX | AD6500OKHLBOX |
| OPN Tray | AD7800YBI44JA | AD6500OKA44HL |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2076 | 2065 |
| Série | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | AMD A8-Series APU for Desktops |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Richland | |
| Date de sortie | June 2013 | |
Performance |
||
| Fréquence de base | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 12 | |
| Cache L1 | 256 KB | 192 KB |
| Cache L2 | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 32 nm SOI |
| Température de noyau maximale | 71.30°C | 71.30°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.9 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
| Ouvert | ||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Taille de dé | 246 mm | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| Compte de transistor | 1178 million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Fréquence mémoire prise en charge | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 720 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 512 | 256 |
| Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8570D |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Nombre de pipelines | 256 | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FM2+ | FM2 |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | |
