AMD A10-7800 vs AMD A8-6500
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD A10-7800 und AMD A8-6500 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Peripherien. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A10-7800
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- Etwa {Prozent}% mehr L1 Cache; weitere Daten können im Cache L1 gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 3201 vs 2817
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1390 vs 1304
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.473 vs 3.921
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 10.821 vs 8.804
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.18 vs 0.167
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.668 vs 0.55
- Etwa 64% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.524 vs 2.751
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1750 vs 867
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1750 vs 867
| Spezifikationen | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB vs 192 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3201 vs 2817 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1390 vs 1304 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.473 vs 3.921 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.821 vs 8.804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.18 vs 0.167 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.668 vs 0.55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.524 vs 2.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1750 vs 867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1750 vs 867 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A8-6500
- Etwa 5% höhere Taktfrequenz: 4.1 GHz vs 3.9 GHz
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1470 vs 1462
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 490 vs 476
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2306 vs 1508
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 vs 3316
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2306 vs 1508
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 vs 3316
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 4.1 GHz vs 3.9 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1470 vs 1462 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 490 vs 476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2306 vs 1508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3341 vs 3316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2306 vs 1508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3341 vs 3316 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD A10-7800
CPU 2: AMD A8-6500
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD A10-7800 | AMD A8-6500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1462 | 1470 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3201 | 2817 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 476 | 490 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1390 | 1304 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.473 | 3.921 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.821 | 8.804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.18 | 0.167 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.668 | 0.55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.524 | 2.751 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1750 | 867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1508 | 2306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3316 | 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1750 | 867 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1508 | 2306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3316 | 3341 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD A10-7800 | AMD A8-6500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
| OPN PIB | AD7800YBJABOX | AD6500OKHLBOX |
| OPN Tray | AD7800YBI44JA | AD6500OKA44HL |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1993 | 1997 |
| Serie | AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops | AMD A8-Series APU for Desktops |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architektur Codename | Richland | |
| Startdatum | June 2013 | |
Leistung |
||
| Base frequency | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 12 | |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 32 nm SOI |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 71.30°C | 71.30°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.9 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Freigegeben | ||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Matrizengröße | 246 mm | |
| Maximale Gehäusetemperatur (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1178 million | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 | |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 720 MHz | 800 MHz |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 512 | 256 |
| Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8570D |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Anzahl der Rohrleitungen | 256 | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FM2+ | FM2 |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | |
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD A10-7800 mit anderen
AMDA10-7800 vs
IntelCore i7-3770K
AMDA10-7800 vs
IntelCore i5-4670S
AMDA10-7800 vs
AMDA8-6500
AMDA10-7800 vs
AMDA6-6400K
AMDA10-7800 vs
AMDA10-7700K
AMDA10-7800 vs
IntelPentium G3450T
