AMD A8-9600 versus Intel Celeron G3930
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A8-9600 et Intel Celeron G3930 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Qualité des images graphiques, Sécurité & fiabilité. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A8-9600
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Processeur est ouvert; un multiplicateur ouvert soutien le overclocking plus facile
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- Environ 17% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.4 GHz versus 2.9 GHz
- 4x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3298 versus 2250
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1409 versus 1267
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 129.751 versus 126.642
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.041 versus 0.88
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.198 versus 4.015
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2015 versus 1000
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3006 versus 1837
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9707 versus 3278
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2015 versus 1000
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3006 versus 1837
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9707 versus 3278
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 July 2017 versus January 2017 |
| Ouvert | Ouvert versus barré |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.4 GHz versus 2.9 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB versus 256 KB (per core) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3298 versus 2250 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1409 versus 1267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 129.751 versus 126.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.041 versus 0.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.198 versus 4.015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2015 versus 1000 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3006 versus 1837 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9707 versus 3278 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2015 versus 1000 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3006 versus 1837 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9707 versus 3278 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron G3930
- Environ 11% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 100°C versus 90°C
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 27% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 51 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1773 versus 1486
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 689 versus 475
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.874 versus 3.637
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.648 versus 5.073
| Caractéristiques | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 100°C versus 90°C |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 51 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1773 versus 1486 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 689 versus 475 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 13.874 versus 3.637 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.648 versus 5.073 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A8-9600
CPU 2: Intel Celeron G3930
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD A8-9600 | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1486 | 1773 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3298 | 2250 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 475 | 689 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1409 | 1267 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 1407 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.637 | 13.874 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 129.751 | 126.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.041 | 0.88 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.198 | 4.015 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.073 | 13.648 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2015 | 1000 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3006 | 1837 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9707 | 3278 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2015 | 1000 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3006 | 1837 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9707 | 3278 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD A8-9600 | Intel Celeron G3930 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Bristol Ridge | Kaby Lake |
| Family | AMD A-Series Processors | |
| Date de sortie | 27 July 2017 | January 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $78 | |
| OPN PIB | AD9600AGABBOX | |
| OPN Tray | AD9600AGM44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1079 | 1767 |
| Prix maintenant | $64.99 | $51.17 |
| Série | AMD A8-Series APU for Desktops | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 22.69 | 17.48 |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Processor Number | G3930 | |
| Status | Launched | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.1 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 10 | |
| Taille de dé | 246 mm | |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 74 °C | 65 °C |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 100°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.4 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Compte de transistor | 1178 million | |
| Ouvert | ||
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| Cache L1 | 64 KB (per core) | |
| Cache L3 | 2048 KB (shared) | |
| Number of QPI Links | 0 | |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4 | DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB | |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 900 MHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 6 | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Radeon R7 Series | Intel® HD Graphics 610 |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Device ID | 0x5902 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 64 GB | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP | 45/65 Watt | |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Prise courants soutenu | AM4 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 51 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 8 | 16 |
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 x8 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Technologies élevé |
||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD A8-9600 avec des autres
AMDA8-9600 vs
IntelCore i5-2390T
AMDA8-9600 vs
AMDRyzen Threadripper 1920X
AMDA8-9600 vs
AMDPRO A4-8350B
AMDA8-9600 vs
AMDA10-6800B
AMDA8-9600 vs
IntelCeleron G3900T
AMDA8-9600 vs
IntelPentium G3260T
