AMD A9-9430 versus Intel Core i7-6700
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD A9-9430 et Intel Core i7-6700 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Sécurité & fiabilité. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A9-9430
- Environ 87400% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3500 MHz versus 4.00 GHz
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.568 versus 5.51
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 142.793 versus 87.719
- 5.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.424 versus 2.778
- 5.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 38.08 versus 6.707
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4616 versus 4216
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4616 versus 4216
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3500 MHz versus 4.00 GHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.568 versus 5.51 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.793 versus 87.719 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.424 versus 2.778 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.08 versus 6.707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4616 versus 4216 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4616 versus 4216 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i7-6700
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- 6 plus de fils: 8 versus 2
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 60% plus de la cache L1, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L1 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.699 versus 0.688
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1719 versus 830
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3081 versus 1522
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1719 versus 830
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3081 versus 1522
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 8 versus 2 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Cache L1 | 256 KB versus 160 KB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.699 versus 0.688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1719 versus 830 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3081 versus 1522 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1719 versus 830 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3081 versus 1522 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD A9-9430
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-6700
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD A9-9430 | Intel Core i7-6700 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.568 | 5.51 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.793 | 87.719 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.688 | 0.699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.424 | 2.778 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.08 | 6.707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 830 | 1719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1522 | 3081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4616 | 4216 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 830 | 1719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1522 | 3081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4616 | 4216 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2281 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 8059 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 978 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3792 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2838 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD A9-9430 | Intel Core i7-6700 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Stoney Ridge | Skylake |
| Family | AMD A9-Series | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1382 | 1395 |
| Processor Number | A9-9430 | i7-6700 |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Date de sortie | 5 August 2015 | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $303 | |
| Prix maintenant | $340.56 | |
| Série | 6th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.66 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3200 MHz | 3.40 GHz |
| Cache L1 | 160 KB | 256 KB |
| Cache L2 | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Fréquence maximale | 3500 MHz | 4.00 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 8 |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | |
| Cache L3 | 8 MB | |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Température de noyau maximale | 71°C | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | 2 |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 34.1 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 64 GB | |
Graphiques |
||
| Graphiques du processeur | Radeon R5 series | Intel® HD Graphics 530 |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Device ID | 0x1912 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1.15 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 64 GB | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Package Size | micro-BGA | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | BGA (FT4) | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Technologies élevé |
||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | N / A | |
| Résolution maximale sur WiDi | 1080p | |
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD A9-9430 avec des autres
AMDA9-9430 vs
AMDA10-7870K
AMDA9-9430 vs
IntelCore i7-7820X
AMDA9-9430 vs
IntelCore i7-9700K
AMDA9-9430 vs
AMDA6-6420K
AMDA9-9430 vs
AMDA8 PRO-7600B
AMDA9-9430 vs
IntelCore i3-4350T
