AMD E2-7110 versus Intel Celeron N3060
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD E2-7110 et Intel Celeron N3060 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Sécurité & fiabilité. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD E2-7110
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 1510 versus 660
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 101.163 versus 70.313
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.252 versus 4.417
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.962 versus 9.107
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 577 versus 498
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3049 versus 2267
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 577 versus 498
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3049 versus 2267
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 May 2015 versus 1 April 2015 |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1510 versus 660 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 101.163 versus 70.313 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.252 versus 4.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.962 versus 9.107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 577 versus 498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 versus 2267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 577 versus 498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 versus 2267 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron N3060
- Environ 38% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.48 GHz versus 1.8 GHz
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 10.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 6 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 628 versus 610
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.598 versus 1.23
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.449 versus 0.354
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1431 versus 1098
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1431 versus 1098
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.48 GHz versus 1.8 GHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt versus 65 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 628 versus 610 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.598 versus 1.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.449 versus 0.354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1431 versus 1098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1431 versus 1098 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD E2-7110
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N3060
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD E2-7110 | Intel Celeron N3060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 610 | 628 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1510 | 660 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 205 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 664 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.23 | 4.598 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 101.163 | 70.313 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.354 | 0.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.252 | 4.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.962 | 9.107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 577 | 498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1098 | 1431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 | 2267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 577 | 498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1098 | 1431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 | 2267 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD E2-7110 | Intel Celeron N3060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Carrizo-L | Braswell |
| Family | AMD E-Series Processors | |
| Date de sortie | 7 May 2015 | 1 April 2015 |
| OPN Tray | EM7110JBY44JB | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2327 | 2308 |
| Série | AMD E2-Series APU for Laptops | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series |
| Segment vertical | Laptop | Mobile |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $107 | |
| Processor Number | N3060 | |
| Status | Launched | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.8 GHz | 1.60 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | 90°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 1.8 GHz | 2.48 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 2 |
| Compte de transistor | 930 Million | |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 1 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L | DDR3L-1600 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB | |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 600 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 400 |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Unités d’éxécution | 12 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 320 MHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 8 GB | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| eDP | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Prise courants soutenu | FP4, FT3b | FCBGA1170 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| LAN integré | ||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 4 | |
| Nombre maximale des ports SATA 6 Gb/s | 2 | |
| Nombre des ports USB | 5 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4/2x2/1x2 + 2x1/4x1 | |
| Nombre total des ports SATA | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| Révision USB | 2.0/3.0 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® Rapid Storage (RST) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD E2-7110 avec des autres
AMDE2-7110 vs
AMDTurion X2 Ultra ZM-84
AMDE2-7110 vs
IntelCore i3-2332M
AMDE2-7110 vs
IntelCore i7-3555LE
AMDE2-7110 vs
IntelAtom E3827
AMDE2-7110 vs
AMDA10-7300
AMDE2-7110 vs
AMDA9-9420e
