AMD E2-7110 vs Intel Celeron N3060
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD E2-7110 und Intel Celeron N3060 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD E2-7110
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Monat(e) später
- 2 mehr Kerne, mehr Anwendungen auf einmal ausführen: 4 vs 2
- 2 Mehr Kanäle: 4 vs 2
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 1510 vs 660
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 101.163 vs 70.313
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.252 vs 4.417
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 18.962 vs 9.107
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 577 vs 498
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3049 vs 2267
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 577 vs 498
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3049 vs 2267
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 7 May 2015 vs 1 April 2015 |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 vs 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 vs 2 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1510 vs 660 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 101.163 vs 70.313 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.252 vs 4.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.962 vs 9.107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 577 vs 498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 vs 2267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 577 vs 498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 vs 2267 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Celeron N3060
- Etwa 38% höhere Taktfrequenz: 2.48 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 10.8x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 6 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 628 vs 610
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.598 vs 1.23
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.449 vs 0.354
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1431 vs 1098
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1431 vs 1098
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.48 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 628 vs 610 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.598 vs 1.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.449 vs 0.354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1431 vs 1098 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1431 vs 1098 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD E2-7110
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N3060
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD E2-7110 | Intel Celeron N3060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 610 | 628 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1510 | 660 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 205 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 664 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.23 | 4.598 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 101.163 | 70.313 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.354 | 0.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.252 | 4.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.962 | 9.107 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 577 | 498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1098 | 1431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3049 | 2267 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 577 | 498 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1098 | 1431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3049 | 2267 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD E2-7110 | Intel Celeron N3060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Carrizo-L | Braswell |
| Family | AMD E-Series Processors | |
| Startdatum | 7 May 2015 | 1 April 2015 |
| OPN Tray | EM7110JBY44JB | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2327 | 2308 |
| Serie | AMD E2-Series APU for Laptops | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series |
| Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Mobile |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $107 | |
| Processor Number | N3060 | |
| Status | Launched | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 1.8 GHz | 1.60 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | 90°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 1.8 GHz | 2.48 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 2 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 930 Million | |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 1 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1600 MHz | |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3L | DDR3L-1600 |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB | |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 600 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R2 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 400 |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Ausführungseinheiten | 12 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 320 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 8 GB | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| eDP | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | |
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Unterstützte Sockel | FP4, FT3b | FCBGA1170 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4 W | |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Integriertes LAN | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 4 | |
| Maximale Anzahl der SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| Anzahl der USB-Ports | 5 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4/2x2/1x2 + 2x1/4x1 | |
| Gesamtzahl der SATA-Anschlüsse | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB-Überarbeitung | 2.0/3.0 | |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage Technologie (RST) | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD E2-7110 mit anderen
AMDE2-7110 vs
AMDTurion X2 Ultra ZM-84
AMDE2-7110 vs
IntelCore i3-2332M
AMDE2-7110 vs
IntelCore i7-3555LE
AMDE2-7110 vs
IntelAtom E3827
AMDE2-7110 vs
AMDA10-7300
AMDE2-7110 vs
AMDA9-9420e
