AMD FX-8800P versus AMD A4-4300M
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD FX-8800P et AMD A4-4300M pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FX-8800P
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- 2 plus de noyaux, lancer plus d’applications á la fois: 4 versus 2
- Environ 13% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.4 GHz versus 3 GHz
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 28 nm versus 32 nm
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1380 versus 1014
- 2.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2851 versus 1000
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 406 versus 313
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1133 versus 482
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.374 versus 0.74
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4.785 versus 1.13
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.141 versus 0.035
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.544 versus 1.108
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1206 versus 307
- 3.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1206 versus 307
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 3 June 2015 versus 30 June 2012 |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 versus 2 |
Fréquence maximale | 3.4 GHz versus 3 GHz |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 32 nm |
Cache L2 | 2 MB versus 1024 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1380 versus 1014 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2851 versus 1000 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 406 versus 313 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1133 versus 482 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.374 versus 0.74 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.785 versus 1.13 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.141 versus 0.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.544 versus 1.108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1206 versus 307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1206 versus 307 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A4-4300M
- 11x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.292 versus 0.482
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1699 versus 858
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3568 versus 3132
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1699 versus 858
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3568 versus 3132
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.292 versus 0.482 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1699 versus 858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3568 versus 3132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1699 versus 858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3568 versus 3132 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD FX-8800P
CPU 2: AMD A4-4300M
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD FX-8800P | AMD A4-4300M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1380 | 1014 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2851 | 1000 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 406 | 313 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1133 | 482 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.374 | 0.74 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.785 | 1.13 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.141 | 0.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.482 | 5.292 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.544 | 1.108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1206 | 307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 858 | 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3132 | 3568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1206 | 307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 858 | 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3132 | 3568 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD FX-8800P | AMD A4-4300M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Carrizo | Trinity |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
Date de sortie | 3 June 2015 | 30 June 2012 |
OPN Tray | FM880PAAY43KA | |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2358 | 2345 |
Série | AMD FX-Series Processors for AIOs | AMD A-Series |
Segment vertical | All-in-One | Laptop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 2.1 GHz | |
Compute Cores | 12 | |
Cache L2 | 2 MB | 1024 KB |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
Fréquence maximale | 3.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 2 |
Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
Nombre de fils | 4 | |
Compte de transistor | 3100 Million | 1303 Million |
Ouvert | ||
Taille de dé | 246 mm | |
Cache L1 | 96 KB | |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | |
Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | |
Graphiques |
||
Enduro | ||
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 800 MHz | |
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 8 | |
Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | |
Graphiques changeables | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Prise courants soutenu | FP4 | FS1r2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
Périphériques |
||
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | |
Technologies élevé |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |