AMD FX-8800P vs AMD A4-4300M
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD FX-8800P und AMD A4-4300M Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD FX-8800P
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- 2 mehr Kerne, mehr Anwendungen auf einmal ausführen: 4 vs 2
- Etwa 13% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 2x mehr L2 Cache, mehr Daten können im L2 Cache gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- 2.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1380 vs 1014
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2851 vs 1000
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 406 vs 313
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1133 vs 482
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.374 vs 0.74
- 4.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4.785 vs 1.13
- 4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.141 vs 0.035
- 4.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.544 vs 1.108
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1206 vs 307
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1206 vs 307
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 3 June 2015 vs 30 June 2012 |
Anzahl der Adern | 4 vs 2 |
Maximale Frequenz | 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
L2 Cache | 2 MB vs 1024 KB |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1380 vs 1014 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2851 vs 1000 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 406 vs 313 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1133 vs 482 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.374 vs 0.74 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.785 vs 1.13 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.141 vs 0.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.544 vs 1.108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1206 vs 307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1206 vs 307 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A4-4300M
- 11x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 5.292 vs 0.482
- Etwa 98% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1699 vs 858
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3568 vs 3132
- Etwa 98% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1699 vs 858
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3568 vs 3132
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.292 vs 0.482 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1699 vs 858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3568 vs 3132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1699 vs 858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3568 vs 3132 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD FX-8800P
CPU 2: AMD A4-4300M
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FX-8800P | AMD A4-4300M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1380 | 1014 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2851 | 1000 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 406 | 313 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1133 | 482 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.374 | 0.74 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4.785 | 1.13 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.141 | 0.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.482 | 5.292 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.544 | 1.108 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1206 | 307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 858 | 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3132 | 3568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1206 | 307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 858 | 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3132 | 3568 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD FX-8800P | AMD A4-4300M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur Codename | Carrizo | Trinity |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
Startdatum | 3 June 2015 | 30 June 2012 |
OPN Tray | FM880PAAY43KA | |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2359 | 2345 |
Serie | AMD FX-Series Processors for AIOs | AMD A-Series |
Vertikales Segment | All-in-One | Laptop |
Leistung |
||
64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
Base frequency | 2.1 GHz | |
Compute Cores | 12 | |
L2 Cache | 2 MB | 1024 KB |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | |
Maximale Frequenz | 3.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 2 |
Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 3100 Million | 1303 Million |
Freigegeben | ||
Matrizengröße | 246 mm | |
L1 Cache | 96 KB | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | |
Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3 | |
Grafik |
||
Enduro | ||
Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 800 MHz | |
iGPU Kernzahl | 8 | |
Prozessorgrafiken | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | |
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
Unterstützte Sockel | FP4 | FS1r2 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
Peripherien |
||
PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD Elite Experiences | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |