AMD PRO A10-8750B versus AMD PRO A12-9800
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD PRO A10-8750B et AMD PRO A12-9800 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Périphériques. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A10-8750B
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 3.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1790 versus 477
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6033 versus 1715
- 3.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1790 versus 477
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6033 versus 1715
| Caractéristiques | |
| Cache L2 | 4 MB versus 2 MB |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1790 versus 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6033 versus 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1790 versus 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6033 versus 1715 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A12-9800
- Environ 5% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4.2 GHz versus 4 GHz
- Environ 26% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 90°C versus 71.30°C
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1686 versus 1303
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 3705 versus 2879
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.268 versus 17.07
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 279.396 versus 221.069
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.975 versus 1.319
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.196 versus 25.369
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 131.8 versus 88.743
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 4.2 GHz versus 4 GHz |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C versus 71.30°C |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1686 versus 1303 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3705 versus 2879 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.268 versus 17.07 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.396 versus 221.069 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.975 versus 1.319 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.196 versus 25.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 131.8 versus 88.743 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD PRO A10-8750B
CPU 2: AMD PRO A12-9800
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD PRO A10-8750B | AMD PRO A12-9800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1303 | 1686 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2879 | 3705 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 433 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1242 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.07 | 26.268 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 221.069 | 279.396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.319 | 1.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.369 | 34.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 88.743 | 131.8 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1790 | 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6033 | 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1790 | 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6033 | 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1176 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1176 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD PRO A10-8750B | AMD PRO A12-9800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD PRO A-Series Processors |
| OPN Tray | AD875BYBI44JC | AD980BAUM44AB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 949 | 992 |
| Série | AMD PRO A-Series A10 APU for Desktops | AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Desktops |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Date de sortie | 3 October 2016 | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 12 | |
| Cache L2 | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 71.30°C | 90°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 757 MHz | 1108 MHz |
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 512 | |
| Graphiques du processeur | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | R7 |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FM2+ | AM4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| RAID | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD PRO A10-8750B avec des autres
AMDPRO A10-8750B vs
IntelCore i5-6500T
AMDPRO A10-8750B vs
AMDA12-9800
AMDPRO A10-8750B vs
IntelCore i5-8600
AMDPRO A10-8750B vs
IntelCore i9-9900
AMDPRO A10-8750B vs
AMDRyzen 5 3400GE
AMDPRO A10-8750B vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 3350G
