AMD PRO A12-9800 versus Intel Core i7-5775C
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD PRO A12-9800 et Intel Core i7-5775C pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization, Qualité des images graphiques, Sécurité & fiabilité. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD PRO A12-9800
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 4.2 GHz versus 3.70 GHz
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.268 versus 21.742
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 279.396 versus 195.658
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.975 versus 1.01
- 5.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.196 versus 6.638
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 131.8 versus 55.701
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 October 2016 versus 2 June 2015 |
| Fréquence maximale | 4.2 GHz versus 3.70 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB versus 1 MB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.268 versus 21.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.396 versus 195.658 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.975 versus 1.01 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.196 versus 6.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 131.8 versus 55.701 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i7-5775C
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2270 versus 1686
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 7683 versus 3705
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2894 versus 1176
- 12.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6083 versus 477
- 5.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9954 versus 1715
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2894 versus 1176
- 12.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6083 versus 477
- 5.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9954 versus 1715
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2270 versus 1686 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 7683 versus 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2894 versus 1176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6083 versus 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9954 versus 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2894 versus 1176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6083 versus 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9954 versus 1715 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD PRO A12-9800
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-5775C
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD PRO A12-9800 | Intel Core i7-5775C |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1686 | 2270 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3705 | 7683 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.268 | 21.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.396 | 195.658 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.975 | 1.01 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.196 | 6.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 131.8 | 55.701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1176 | 2894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 477 | 6083 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1715 | 9954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1176 | 2894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 477 | 6083 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1715 | 9954 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1055 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4229 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 11035 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD PRO A12-9800 | Intel Core i7-5775C | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
| Date de sortie | 3 October 2016 | 2 June 2015 |
| OPN Tray | AD980BAUM44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 992 | 469 |
| Série | AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Desktops | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Broadwell | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $366 | |
| Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
| Processor Number | i7-5775C | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.20 | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.8 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
| Fréquence maximale | 4.2 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
| Ouvert | ||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| Cache L1 | 256 KB | |
| Cache L3 | 6 MB | |
| Nombre de fils | 8 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | |
Graphiques |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1108 MHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Graphiques du processeur | R7 | Intel® Iris® Pro Graphics 6200 |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Device ID | 0x1622 | |
| eDRAM | 128 MB | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 32 GB | |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
| VGA | ||
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Prise courants soutenu | AM4 | FCLGA1150 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Configurable TDP-down | 37 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 2.20 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Thermal Solution | PCA 2013D | |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Résolution maximale sur DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Résolution maximale sur VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD PRO A12-9800 avec des autres
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
IntelCore i5-2500T
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
IntelCeleron G3900T
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
IntelCore i3-9300T
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 3400GE
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
AMDAthlon Gold PRO 3150G
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
AMDRyzen 5 4500
