AMD PRO A12-9800 vs Intel Core i7-5775C
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD PRO A12-9800 und Intel Core i7-5775C Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung, Grafik-Bildqualität, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD PRO A12-9800
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 4 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 14% höhere Taktfrequenz: 4.2 GHz vs 3.70 GHz
- 2x mehr L2 Cache, mehr Daten können im L2 Cache gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.268 vs 21.742
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 279.396 vs 195.658
- Etwa 96% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.975 vs 1.01
- 5.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.196 vs 6.638
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 131.8 vs 55.701
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 3 October 2016 vs 2 June 2015 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 4.2 GHz vs 3.70 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB vs 1 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.268 vs 21.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.396 vs 195.658 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.975 vs 1.01 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.196 vs 6.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 131.8 vs 55.701 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core i7-5775C
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2270 vs 1686
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 7683 vs 3705
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2894 vs 1176
- 12.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6083 vs 477
- 5.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9954 vs 1715
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2894 vs 1176
- 12.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6083 vs 477
- 5.8x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9954 vs 1715
| Spezifikationen | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2270 vs 1686 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 7683 vs 3705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2894 vs 1176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6083 vs 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9954 vs 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2894 vs 1176 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6083 vs 477 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9954 vs 1715 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD PRO A12-9800
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-5775C
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD PRO A12-9800 | Intel Core i7-5775C |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1686 | 2270 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3705 | 7683 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.268 | 21.742 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 279.396 | 195.658 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.975 | 1.01 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.196 | 6.638 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 131.8 | 55.701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1176 | 2894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 477 | 6083 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1715 | 9954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1176 | 2894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 477 | 6083 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1715 | 9954 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1055 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4229 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 11035 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD PRO A12-9800 | Intel Core i7-5775C | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
| Startdatum | 3 October 2016 | 2 June 2015 |
| OPN Tray | AD980BAUM44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 992 | 469 |
| Serie | AMD PRO A-Series A12 APU for Desktops | 5th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architektur Codename | Broadwell | |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $366 | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $449.99 | |
| Processor Number | i7-5775C | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 7.20 | |
Leistung |
||
| Base frequency | 3.8 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 1 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 4.2 GHz | 3.70 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
| Freigegeben | ||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB | |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | |
Grafik |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1108 MHz | 1.15 GHz |
| Prozessorgrafiken | R7 | Intel® Iris® Pro Graphics 6200 |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Device ID | 0x1622 | |
| eDRAM | 128 MB | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD Technologie | ||
| Intel® Clear Video Technologie | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D-Technologie | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 32 GB | |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | |
| VGA | ||
| Unterstützung für Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Kompatibilität |
||
| Unterstützte Sockel | AM4 | FCLGA1150 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Configurable TDP-down | 37 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 2.20 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Thermal Solution | PCA 2013D | |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Befehlssatzerweiterungen | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Maximale Auflösung über DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
| Maximale Auflösung über VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD PRO A12-9800 mit anderen
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
IntelCore i5-2500T
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
IntelCeleron G3900T
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
IntelCore i3-9300T
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 3400GE
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
AMDAthlon Gold PRO 3150G
AMDPRO A12-9800 vs
AMDRyzen 5 4500
