AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE versus AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE et AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Compatibilité, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 13% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.4 GHz versus 3 GHz
- Environ 32% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 95 Watt versus 125 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1302 versus 1213
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2370 versus 2358
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 435 versus 397
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1359 versus 1331
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.563 versus 3.763
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 13.634 versus 11.035
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.224 versus 0.192
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.98 versus 3.856
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | June 2010 versus January 2009 |
Fréquence maximale | 3.4 GHz versus 3 GHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt versus 125 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1302 versus 1213 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2370 versus 2358 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 435 versus 397 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1359 versus 1331 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.563 versus 3.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.634 versus 11.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.224 versus 0.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.98 versus 3.856 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE | AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1302 | 1213 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2370 | 2358 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 435 | 397 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1359 | 1331 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.563 | 3.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.634 | 11.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.224 | 0.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.457 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.98 | 3.856 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE | AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Zosma | Deneb |
Family | AMD Phenom | |
Date de sortie | June 2010 | January 2009 |
OPN PIB | HD96ZTWFGRBOX | |
OPN Tray | HD96ZTWFK4DGR | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2862 | 2867 |
Série | AMD Phenom II X4 Black | |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 3 GHz | |
Taille de dé | 346 mm | 258 mm |
Cache L1 | 512 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
Cache L2 | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
Cache L3 | 6144 KB (shared) | 6144 KB (shared) |
Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 71°C | |
Fréquence maximale | 3.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Nombre de fils | 4 | |
Compte de transistor | 904 million | 758 million |
Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibilité |
||
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
Prise courants soutenu | AM3 | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 125 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |