AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G versus AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G et AMD Ryzen 3 2200G pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- 4 plus de fils: 8 versus 4
- Environ 5% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.9 GHz versus 3.7 GHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 2154 versus 2052
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 8507 versus 6767
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.509 versus 28.581
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 393.562 versus 356.091
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 versus 2.276
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.002 versus 38.679
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 208.928 versus 136.274
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 May 2018 versus 12 February 2018 |
| Nombre de fils | 8 versus 4 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.9 GHz versus 3.7 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2154 versus 2052 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 8507 versus 6767 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.509 versus 28.581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 393.562 versus 356.091 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 versus 2.276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.002 versus 38.679 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 208.928 versus 136.274 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2802 versus 1858
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3768 versus 1994
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10990 versus 5566
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2802 versus 1858
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3768 versus 1994
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10990 versus 5566
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2802 versus 1858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3768 versus 1994 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10990 versus 5566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2802 versus 1858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3768 versus 1994 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10990 versus 5566 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2154 | 2052 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 8507 | 6767 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.509 | 28.581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 393.562 | 356.091 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 2.276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.002 | 38.679 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 208.928 | 136.274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1858 | 2802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1994 | 3768 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5566 | 10990 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1858 | 2802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1994 | 3768 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5566 | 10990 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 852 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2736 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1678 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Raven Ridge | Zen |
| Family | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors | AMD Ryzen Processors |
| Date de sortie | 10 May 2018 | 12 February 2018 |
| OPN Tray | YD240BC5M4MFB | YD2200C5M4MFB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 244 | 316 |
| Série | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD Ryzen 3 Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
| OPN PIB | YD2200C5FBBOX | |
| Prix maintenant | $97.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 22.31 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 15 | |
| Taille de dé | 210 mm | 246 mm |
| Cache L1 | 384 KB | 384 KB |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Cache L3 | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm FinFET | 14 nm FinFET |
| Température de noyau maximale | 95°C | 95°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 11 | 8 |
| Nombre de fils | 8 | 4 |
| Compte de transistor | 4950 million | 4500 Million |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | 2993 MHz |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphiques |
||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1250 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 11 | 8 |
| Graphiques du processeur | Radeon Vega 11 Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP | 46-65 Watt | 46-65 Watt |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Prise courants soutenu | AM4 | AM4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Wraith Stealth | Wraith Stealth |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 x8 |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
| AMD VR Ready Processors | ||
| Enmotus FuzeDrive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G avec des autres
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2400G vs
AMDRyzen 3 2200G
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2400G vs
AMDRyzen 7 PRO 5750G
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2400G vs
IntelCore i7-12700K
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2400G vs
IntelCore i7-12700T
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2400G vs
AMDRyzen 7 7700
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2400G vs
IntelCore i3-14100
