AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G vs AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G und AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Monat(e) später
- 4 Mehr Kanäle: 8 vs 4
- Etwa 5% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2155 vs 2052
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 8511 vs 6767
- Etwa 49% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.509 vs 28.581
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 393.562 vs 356.091
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 vs 2.276
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.002 vs 38.679
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 208.928 vs 136.274
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 10 May 2018 vs 12 February 2018 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 vs 4 |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.9 GHz vs 3.7 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2155 vs 2052 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 8511 vs 6767 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.509 vs 28.581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 393.562 vs 356.091 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 vs 2.276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.002 vs 38.679 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 208.928 vs 136.274 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2802 vs 1858
- Etwa 89% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3768 vs 1994
- Etwa 97% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10990 vs 5566
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2802 vs 1858
- Etwa 89% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3768 vs 1994
- Etwa 97% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10990 vs 5566
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2802 vs 1858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3768 vs 1994 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10990 vs 5566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2802 vs 1858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3768 vs 1994 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10990 vs 5566 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2155 | 2052 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 8511 | 6767 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.509 | 28.581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 393.562 | 356.091 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 2.276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.002 | 38.679 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 208.928 | 136.274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1858 | 2802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1994 | 3768 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5566 | 10990 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1858 | 2802 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1994 | 3768 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5566 | 10990 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 852 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2736 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 1678 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Raven Ridge | Zen |
| Family | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors | AMD Ryzen Processors |
| Startdatum | 10 May 2018 | 12 February 2018 |
| OPN Tray | YD240BC5M4MFB | YD2200C5M4MFB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 244 | 316 |
| Serie | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD Ryzen 3 Desktop Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| OPN PIB | YD2200C5FBBOX | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $97.99 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 22.31 | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Compute Cores | 15 | |
| Matrizengröße | 210 mm | 246 mm |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm FinFET | 14 nm FinFET |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 95°C | 95°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 11 | 8 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 4950 million | 4500 Million |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2933 MHz | 2993 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Grafik |
||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1250 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 11 | 8 |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Radeon Vega 11 Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP | 46-65 Watt | 46-65 Watt |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Unterstützte Sockel | AM4 | AM4 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Wraith Stealth | Wraith Stealth |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 x8 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
| AMD VR Ready Processors | ||
| Enmotus FuzeDrive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G mit anderen
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2400G vs
AMDRyzen 3 2200G
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2400G vs
AMDRyzen 7 PRO 5750G
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2400G vs
IntelCore i7-12700K
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2400G vs
IntelCore i7-12700KF
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2400G vs
IntelCore i7-12700T
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2400G vs
AMDRyzen 7 7700
