AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U versus AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U et AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 376.268 versus 371.859
| Référence | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 704 versus 701 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 376.268 versus 371.859 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
- Environ 6% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.8 GHz versus 3.6 GHz
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1955 versus 1788
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 7175 versus 6660
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2588 versus 2503
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.72 versus 25.516
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.505 versus 2.115
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.824 versus 30.83
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.54 versus 101.686
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2056 versus 1569
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2113 versus 1744
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8030 versus 5962
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2056 versus 1569
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2113 versus 1744
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8030 versus 5962
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.8 GHz versus 3.6 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1955 versus 1788 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 7175 versus 6660 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2588 versus 2503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.72 versus 25.516 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.505 versus 2.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.824 versus 30.83 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.54 versus 101.686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2056 versus 1569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2113 versus 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8030 versus 5962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2056 versus 1569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2113 versus 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8030 versus 5962 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1788 | 1955 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6660 | 7175 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 704 | 701 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2503 | 2588 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.516 | 30.72 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 376.268 | 371.859 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.115 | 2.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.83 | 38.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.686 | 163.54 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1569 | 2056 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1744 | 2113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5962 | 8030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1569 | 2056 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1744 | 2113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5962 | 8030 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Zen | Zen |
| Family | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors |
| Date de sortie | 10 January 2018 | 10 January 2018 |
| OPN Tray | YM250BC4T4MFB | YM270BC4T4MFB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 747 | 446 |
| Série | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
| Segment vertical | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Taille de dé | 246 mm | 246 mm |
| Cache L1 | 384 KB | 384 KB |
| Cache L2 | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Cache L3 | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 95°C | 95°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | 10 |
| Nombre de fils | 8 | 8 |
| Compte de transistor | 4500 Million | 4500 Million |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphiques |
||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1100 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 8 | 10 |
| Graphiques du processeur | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 Graphics |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12-25 Watt | 12-25 Watt |
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Prise courants soutenu | FP5 | FP5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Not included | Not included |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U avec des autres
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
IntelXeon E5-2628L v3
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
AMDRyzen 7 4700U
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
AMDRyzen 9 4900H
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
AMDRyzen 5 4600U
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
IntelXeon W-11555MLE
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
IntelXeon W-1250E
