AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U und AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 376.268 vs 371.859
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 704 vs 701 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 376.268 vs 371.859 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
- Etwa 6% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1919 vs 1793
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 6987 vs 6637
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2588 vs 2503
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.72 vs 25.516
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.505 vs 2.115
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.824 vs 30.83
- Etwa 61% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 163.54 vs 101.686
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2056 vs 1569
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2113 vs 1744
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8030 vs 5962
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2056 vs 1569
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2113 vs 1744
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8030 vs 5962
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1919 vs 1793 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6987 vs 6637 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2588 vs 2503 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.72 vs 25.516 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.505 vs 2.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.824 vs 30.83 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.54 vs 101.686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2056 vs 1569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2113 vs 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8030 vs 5962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2056 vs 1569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2113 vs 1744 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8030 vs 5962 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1793 | 1919 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6637 | 6987 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 704 | 701 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2503 | 2588 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.516 | 30.72 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 376.268 | 371.859 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.115 | 2.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.83 | 38.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.686 | 163.54 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1569 | 2056 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1744 | 2113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5962 | 8030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1569 | 2056 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1744 | 2113 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5962 | 8030 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Zen | Zen |
| Family | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors |
| Startdatum | 10 January 2018 | 10 January 2018 |
| OPN Tray | YM250BC4T4MFB | YM270BC4T4MFB |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 800 | 460 |
| Serie | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics |
| Vertikales Segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Basistaktfrequenz | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Matrizengröße | 246 mm | 246 mm |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 95°C | 95°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | 10 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 8 | 8 |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 4500 Million | 4500 Million |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Unterstützte Speicherfrequenz | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Grafik |
||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 1100 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 8 | 10 |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 Graphics |
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP | 12-25 Watt | 12-25 Watt |
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | 1 |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FP5 | FP5 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | Not included | Not included |
Peripherien |
||
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U mit anderen
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
IntelCore i5-6500TE
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
AMDRyzen 7 4800U
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
AMDRyzen 7 PRO 4750U
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
AMDRyzen 7 5700U
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
IntelCore i7-1265UE
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2500U vs
IntelCore i9-12900TE
