Intel Celeron G1620 versus Intel Core i3-3220
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Celeron G1620 et Intel Core i3-3220 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron G1620
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.514 versus 2.048
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 19.177 versus 7.493
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | December 2012 versus 8 April 2012 |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.514 versus 2.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.177 versus 7.493 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1528 versus 1527 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1528 versus 1527 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i3-3220
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Environ 22% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.3 GHz versus 2.7 GHz
- Environ 50% plus de la cache L3, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L3 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1729 versus 1451
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2265 versus 1560
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 607 versus 470
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1340 versus 878
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.277 versus 0.19
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.059 versus 0.878
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.499 versus 1.933
| Caractéristiques | |
| Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.3 GHz versus 2.7 GHz |
| Cache L3 | 3072 KB versus 2048 KB (shared) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1729 versus 1451 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2265 versus 1560 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 607 versus 470 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1340 versus 878 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.277 versus 0.19 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.059 versus 0.878 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.499 versus 1.933 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Celeron G1620
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-3220
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Celeron G1620 | Intel Core i3-3220 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1451 | 1729 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1560 | 2265 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 470 | 607 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 878 | 1340 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.514 | 2.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 19.177 | 7.493 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.19 | 0.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.878 | 1.059 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.933 | 2.499 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1528 | 1527 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1528 | 1527 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Celeron G1620 | Intel Core i3-3220 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Ivy Bridge | Ivy Bridge |
| Date de sortie | December 2012 | 8 April 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $208 | $117 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2721 | 2707 |
| Prix maintenant | $153.59 | $34.90 |
| Processor Number | G1620 | i3-3220 |
| Série | Intel® Celeron® Processor G Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 4.95 | 35.75 |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.70 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Taille de dé | 94 mm | 94 mm |
| Cache L1 | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| Cache L2 | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| Cache L3 | 2048 KB (shared) | 3072 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 65 °C | 65 °C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.7 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 4 |
| Température de noyau maximale | 65.3°C | |
Mémoire |
||
| Soutien de la mémoire ECC | ||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 21 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3 1333 | DDR3 1333/1600 |
Graphiques |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1.05 GHz | 1.05 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 |
| Device ID | 0x152 | |
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCLGA1155 | FCLGA1155 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 55 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 2011C | 2011C |
Périphériques |
||
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 | up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 & 2x4 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Celeron G1620 avec des autres
IntelCeleron G1620 vs
AMDAthlon 64 4000+
IntelCeleron G1620 vs
IntelCeleron 420
IntelCeleron G1620 vs
IntelPentium E5300
IntelCeleron G1620 vs
AMDSempron 140
IntelCeleron G1620 vs
IntelCeleron G460
IntelCeleron G1620 vs
AMDFX-6200
