Intel Celeron J4105 versus AMD FX-8800P
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Celeron J4105 et AMD FX-8800P pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron J4105
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 105°C versus 90°C
- Un processus de fabrication nouveau soutien un processeur avec plus de pouvoir, mais moins chaud: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 15 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2891 versus 2834
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 412 versus 406
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1365 versus 1133
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.374 versus 2.374
- 6.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30 versus 4.785
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.261 versus 0.141
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.281 versus 0.482
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1384 versus 858
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1384 versus 858
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 versus 3 June 2015 |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C versus 90°C |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Cache L2 | 4 MB versus 2 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 15 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2891 versus 2834 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 versus 406 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1365 versus 1133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.374 versus 2.374 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30 versus 4.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.261 versus 0.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.281 versus 0.482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1384 versus 858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1384 versus 858 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FX-8800P
- Environ 36% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.4 GHz versus 2.50 GHz
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1361 versus 1085
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.544 versus 2.947
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1206 versus 722
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3132 versus 2229
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1206 versus 722
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3132 versus 2229
| Caractéristiques | |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.4 GHz versus 2.50 GHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1361 versus 1085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.544 versus 2.947 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1206 versus 722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3132 versus 2229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1206 versus 722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3132 versus 2229 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Celeron J4105
CPU 2: AMD FX-8800P
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Celeron J4105 | AMD FX-8800P |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1085 | 1361 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2891 | 2834 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | 406 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1365 | 1133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.374 | 2.374 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30 | 4.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.261 | 0.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.281 | 0.482 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.947 | 4.544 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 722 | 1206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1384 | 858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2229 | 3132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 722 | 1206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1384 | 858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2229 | 3132 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Celeron J4105 | AMD FX-8800P | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Gemini Lake | Carrizo |
| Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 | 3 June 2015 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $107 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2434 | 2379 |
| Prix maintenant | $107 | |
| Processor Number | J4105 | |
| Série | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series | AMD FX-Series Processors for AIOs |
| Status | Launched | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.27 | |
| Segment vertical | Desktop | All-in-One |
| Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
| OPN Tray | FM880PAAY43KA | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 1.50 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Cache L2 | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C | 90°C |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.50 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
| Compute Cores | 12 | |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
| Compte de transistor | 3100 Million | |
| Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB | |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400 MT/s | DDR3 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x3185 | |
| Unités d’éxécution | 12 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 250 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 750 MHz | |
| Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 8 GB | |
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® UHD Graphics 600 | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| Enduro | ||
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 800 MHz | |
| Compte de noyaux iGPU | 8 | |
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| MIPI-DSI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | |
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
| Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 25mm x 24mm | |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1090 | FP4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 105 deg C | |
Périphériques |
||
| LAN integré | ||
| Integrated Wireless | Intel® Wireless-AC MAC | |
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 6 | |
| Nombre maximale des ports SATA 6 Gb/s | 2 | |
| Nombre des ports USB | 8 | |
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 | |
| Nombre total des ports SATA | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| Révision USB | 2.0/3.0 | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Celeron J4105 avec des autres
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
IntelCore i5-2500K
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
IntelCeleron G1820
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
AMDFX-8370
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
AMDAthlon 5350
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
IntelCore i5-3340
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
AMDAthlon X2 450
