Intel Celeron J4105 vs AMD FX-8800P
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Celeron J4105 und AMD FX-8800P Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Grafik-Bildqualität, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Celeron J4105
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 6 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 17% höhere Kerntemperatur: 105°C vs 90°C
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht einen leistungsfähigeren, aber dennoch kühleren laufenden Prozessor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x mehr L2 Cache, mehr Daten können im L2 Cache gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- Etwa 50% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 2891 vs 2834
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 412 vs 406
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1365 vs 1133
- Etwa 42% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.374 vs 2.374
- 6.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 30 vs 4.785
- Etwa 85% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.261 vs 0.141
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.281 vs 0.482
- Etwa 61% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1384 vs 858
- Etwa 61% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1384 vs 858
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 11 December 2017 vs 3 June 2015 |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 105°C vs 90°C |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2891 vs 2834 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 vs 406 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1365 vs 1133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.374 vs 2.374 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30 vs 4.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.261 vs 0.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.281 vs 0.482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1384 vs 858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1384 vs 858 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD FX-8800P
- Etwa 36% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3.4 GHz vs 2.50 GHz
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1361 vs 1085
- Etwa 54% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.544 vs 2.947
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1206 vs 722
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3132 vs 2229
- Etwa 67% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1206 vs 722
- Etwa 41% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3132 vs 2229
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3.4 GHz vs 2.50 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1361 vs 1085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.544 vs 2.947 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1206 vs 722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3132 vs 2229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1206 vs 722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3132 vs 2229 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Celeron J4105
CPU 2: AMD FX-8800P
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Celeron J4105 | AMD FX-8800P |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1085 | 1361 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2891 | 2834 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | 406 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1365 | 1133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.374 | 2.374 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30 | 4.785 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.261 | 0.141 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.281 | 0.482 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.947 | 4.544 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 722 | 1206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1384 | 858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2229 | 3132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 722 | 1206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1384 | 858 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2229 | 3132 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel Celeron J4105 | AMD FX-8800P | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Gemini Lake | Carrizo |
| Startdatum | 11 December 2017 | 3 June 2015 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $107 | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 2434 | 2379 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $107 | |
| Processor Number | J4105 | |
| Serie | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series | AMD FX-Series Processors for AIOs |
| Status | Launched | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 7.27 | |
| Vertikales Segment | Desktop | All-in-One |
| Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
| OPN Tray | FM880PAAY43KA | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 1.50 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 105°C | 90°C |
| Maximale Frequenz | 2.50 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Compute Cores | 12 | |
| Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 3100 Million | |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB | |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400 MT/s | DDR3 |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | |
Grafik |
||
| Device ID | 0x3185 | |
| Ausführungseinheiten | 12 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 250 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 750 MHz | |
| Maximaler Videospeicher | 8 GB | |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Intel® UHD Graphics 600 | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| Enduro | ||
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 800 MHz | |
| iGPU Kernzahl | 8 | |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| MIPI-DSI | ||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 3 | |
Grafik-Bildqualität |
||
| Unterstützung von 4K-Auflösungen | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Maximale Anzahl von CPUs in einer Konfiguration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 25mm x 24mm | |
| Unterstützte Sockel | FCBGA1090 | FP4 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | 105 deg C | |
Peripherien |
||
| Integriertes LAN | ||
| Integrated Wireless | Intel® Wireless-AC MAC | |
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 6 | |
| Maximale Anzahl der SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| Anzahl der USB-Ports | 8 | |
| PCI Express Revision | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 | |
| Gesamtzahl der SATA-Anschlüsse | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB-Überarbeitung | 2.0/3.0 | |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
| Anti-Theft Technologie | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection Technologie | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key Technologie | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Smart Response Technologie | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche Intel Celeron J4105 mit anderen
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
IntelCore i5-2500K
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
IntelCeleron G1820
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
AMDFX-8370
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
AMDAthlon 5350
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
IntelCore i5-3340
IntelCeleron J4105 vs
AMDAthlon X2 450
