Intel Celeron J4105 versus Intel Celeron N4100
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Celeron J4105 et Intel Celeron N4100 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Qualité des images graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron J4105
- Environ 4% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.50 GHz versus 2.40 GHz
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1085 versus 1002
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2891 versus 2455
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 412 versus 382
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1365 versus 1160
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 722 versus 506
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1384 versus 1031
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2229 versus 1764
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 722 versus 506
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1384 versus 1031
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2229 versus 1764
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 2.50 GHz versus 2.40 GHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1085 versus 1002 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2891 versus 2455 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 versus 382 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1365 versus 1160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 722 versus 506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1384 versus 1031 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2229 versus 1764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 722 versus 506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1384 versus 1031 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2229 versus 1764 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Celeron N4100
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 6 Watt versus 10 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt versus 10 Watt |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Celeron J4105
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N4100
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Celeron J4105 | Intel Celeron N4100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1085 | 1002 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2891 | 2455 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | 382 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1365 | 1160 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.374 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.261 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.281 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.947 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 722 | 506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1384 | 1031 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2229 | 1764 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 722 | 506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1384 | 1031 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2229 | 1764 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Celeron J4105 | Intel Celeron N4100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Gemini Lake | Gemini Lake |
Date de sortie | 11 December 2017 | 11 December 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $107 | $107 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2434 | 2363 |
Prix maintenant | $107 | $107 |
Processor Number | J4105 | N4100 |
Série | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series |
Status | Launched | Launched |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 7.27 | 6.42 |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Mobile |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 1.50 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
Cache L2 | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Température de noyau maximale | 105°C | 105 °C |
Fréquence maximale | 2.50 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400 MT/s | DDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400MT/s |
Graphiques |
||
Device ID | 0x3185 | 0x3185 |
Unités d’éxécution | 12 | 12 |
Graphics base frequency | 250 MHz | 200 MHz |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 750 MHz | 700 MHz |
Mémoire de vidéo maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Graphiques du processeur | Intel® UHD Graphics 600 | Intel® UHD Graphics 600 |
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
DisplayPort | ||
eDP | ||
HDMI | ||
MIPI-DSI | ||
Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
Qualité des images graphiques |
||
Soutien de la resolution 4K | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Compatibilité |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 25mm x 24mm | 25mm x 24mm |
Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1090 | FCBGA1090 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
Thermal Solution | 105 deg C | 105 deg C |
Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4.8 W | |
Périphériques |
||
LAN integré | ||
Integrated Wireless | Intel® Wireless-AC MAC | Intel® Wireless-AC MAC |
Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 6 | 6 |
Nombre maximale des ports SATA 6 Gb/s | 2 | 2 |
Nombre des ports USB | 8 | 8 |
Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 |
Nombre total des ports SATA | 2 | 2 |
UART | ||
Révision USB | 2.0/3.0 | 2.0/3.0 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
Technologie Intel® Smart Response | ||
Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Speed Shift technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) |